Getting great results
AgentCorp's agents are capable, but the quality of what they produce tracks the quality of your direction and your review. These habits consistently get better output — and keep you safely in control of the work that matters.
Write clear instructions
Brief an agent the way you would brief a sharp new hire: state the outcome, the constraints, and how you want to see the result. Vague asks get generic work; specific asks get useful work.
- Lead with the goal, not the mechanics. Say what 'done' looks like.
- Give constraints up front — tone, length, audience, deadline, what to avoid.
- Provide the inputs: name the account, paste the thread, or point to the right knowledge.
- Ask for a plan before a big task:
“Outline your approach before you start.”
Decide when to require approval
Sensitive and outbound actions already stop for your approval — you see the recipient and message body before anything sends. Use that checkpoint deliberately.
- Keep approvals on for anything that leaves your account or is hard to undo — external emails, messages to customers, financial actions.
- Let read-only and draft-only work run freely; there's nothing to approve when nothing is sent.
- When in doubt, ask the agent to draft and show you rather than act.
Review the output
Treat agent output as strong first-draft work from a capable colleague: usually right, occasionally wrong, always worth a glance before it counts. Skim for the things that actually matter — names, numbers, dates, commitments — before an email goes out or a figure lands in a report.
Give feedback
Agents get more useful as you steer them. If a draft misses, say what was wrong and what you wanted instead — the correction shapes the next attempt. For preferences you will want every time (your email sign-off, your tone, standing facts), put them in the knowledge base so you never have to repeat them.
Understand the limits
- Agents don't know what they weren't given — provide context rather than assuming they can infer it.
- They can hit a step limit on very long tasks; break big jobs into milestones (see troubleshooting).
- They aren't a substitute for professional judgment on legal, financial, or medical decisions.
- Untrusted content they read (a web page, an inbound email) is framed defensively against prompt-injection, but you should still review actions taken off the back of it.
Safe autonomy
As you build trust, you can let agents run longer and intervene less — but do it gradually. Start with tight, well-defined tasks and full review; widen scope as you see reliable results. Keep approvals on for irreversible actions no matter how much you trust the day-to-day work. Autonomy is something you grant on purpose, not a default you forget to check.
Working day to day: talking to Alex, tasking specialists, and reviewing approvals.
Upload documents and facts so your agents have the right context.
Protect your account, apply least privilege, and report issues responsibly.
Fixes for integration re-auth, step limits, 402s, approvals, and WhatsApp.